Martin's Harness
Gordon Rigg|video
Martin writes:
This is my Rotor/Havana "Gizmo", machined out of Stainless Steel, one off prototype. The divots that the hang strap "truck wheels" sit in on a stock Rotor Havana rail are very shallow, with the gizmo, the rear truck wheels are pulled into a much deeper resting spot so the truck stays locked through a wide range of pitch, yet easily unlocks when you force yourself up. The other advantage is the block can be positioned anywhere you want for pitch pressure.
BTW, I hear that Rotor has created the option to have multiple positions in the back plate, also allowing you to tune the balance of the harness.
Gordon Rigg writes:
What you have on the original Havana is two notches, one for each set of wheels, so you get a sort of double click, when the rear wheels go in the front notch, and then a bit further back when the rear wheels transfer into the back notch and the front wheels go in their notch.
Then you can have a look about without it riding out of the notch…so I think maybe a lot of people haven't set it up to get into the true rear notch position, if it is coming out easily.
You can see the front notch at under the front of the stainless insert you made, and the rear notch the other side of it.
I'm not completely sure I want a bigger notch, the clunk to come out of the notch is already quite sudden.
Mine is also putting a lot of weight on the rope, balancing unnecessarily head heavy. So adjustment of slider position on the back plate is a good idea.
I have concerns over the extended shoulders on the back plate. Given that the previous rotor model was already quite close fitting in this area I'm not sure how much advantage they bring, but I didn't fly the previous model to know if this is more comfortable. However unless your leg loops are set nice and tight, when you drop out of prone the extended shoulders on the back plate are up round your ears and I really don't like the idea of that for pilot safety.
Compared to my matrix, the havana is just as comfortable, and lands easier. The longer slider means you have less pressure to rotate into upright and can thus feel the glider trim more easily.
Between the matrix and the havana i had a WV Tenax 3 which was quite a bit worse for landing, needed lots of mods to be able to get down into prone easily ( I thought I might brake the base bar trying) but was also difficult to get upright in. I never really liked it. Now with the tenax 4 they went into some sort of crazy super wide back plate design which only makes sense for people with two parachutes or who want to look like a flying air bed, and don't want to put more than one harness in their car!
Advertisements seem to suggest you can still get the Rotor shadow2, but I know pilots who wanted new shadows and couldn't seem to get them…
Oh and Martin, check your mod isn't tipping the carriage a bit and making the hang strap bunch into the corner of the slot it hangs from. You need to look out for any damage to the strap there.
Martin's responds:
Thanks for the comments, for sure I was double notched… took plenty of time to document with video. In fact, i noted that the machined notches were not quite right on my rail and needed to grind out a small area of the end of the rail to get the truck to sit in both notch points.
Again, even the slightest heads up with relaxed heel tension would result in the slider popping out. My gizzmo, with one aggressive notch does make for a real solid "klunk" but with only one set of wheels sitting in the notch, creates a very positive lock/release feel. In the photo, I ended up moving the rear stop point nearly 3" forward and still ended up with 35 to 40 pound of pressure on the hands at the base tube. Thanks for the comment about the "main" and possible wear in caused by the attachment angle to the truck, I suspect most wear would be related to going upright and not normal flight loads but something to keep an eye on…
BTW… I think part of the issue with the double notch not locking is the fact it is so far aft and the angle naturally pulls the truck forward and the main riser angle truly loads only the rear truck wheels, so in essences, loads only a single (rear) notch, so even if you double notch, the rear truck wheels easily skip past the forward notch.
If they have created a movable rail to tune the fit and balance it might solve what I found to be an issue.
I also believe, had Rotor chosen to use the Covert system it might have yielded a nicer lock/release transition as the Covert uses and angled rail (a little like the Moyes Matrix).
And yes, I agree, the Rotor is a much nicer harness to land.
Discuss "Martin's Harness" at the Oz Report forum link»
2 topics in this article: Gordon Rigg, video
‹@› |